Should Toronto permit substantially more housing as-of-right in every ward, including areas currently dominated by detached and semi-detached homes?
- Dan LovellYes
Written by Dan Lovell in answer to our questionnaire, and published as given. Not our description of them.
Dan is not just your "ally" or "advocate". He is one of you.
Our questionnaire
Dan Lovell’s own answers to the questions we put to every candidate, published as given — including, where they wrote one, their reasoning in their own words.
If it is permanent housing, then yes. But not just a shelter.
We need fewer taxes on working-class people. Not more.
Not through property taxes. Through increases to the vacant home and luxury home taxes and the introduction of a vacant commercial unit tax.
Ward 22 has zero subway or LRT stations, despite upcoming massive density growth.
Across the city if accompanied by expansion of higher-order transit options.
None. I only ticked the least bad option because I must. The best solution is public housing.
Snow removal and recycling are clear examples of the failure of contracting out.
Freeze property tax. Increase vacant and luxury home taxes. Introduce vacant commercial unit tax.
Targeted toward the ultra wealthy and profitable corporations.
Peaceful assembly is protected by the Charter. Shame on those who seek to undermine our constitutional freedoms.
Aimed at the ultra wealthy and profitable corporations.
Each card is one question, with Dan Lovell filed under the answer they gave and their own words underneath it. The other options offered are not shown, nor how the rest of the field answered.
How the whole city answeredRegistered candidates from the City Clerk’s official list, refreshed daily. Campaign sites are linked as published by the candidate; a link is not an endorsement.