A Report on Carney’s First Year in Government

Proposed by

Build Canada

Article
Supported by
Progress is real, but it's mostly groundwork: 77.7% of commitments are In Progress or Completed. But most of that movement looks like consultations launched, early funds deployed, and line items in departmental plans, not outcomes Canadians can see or feel.
Execution has not caught up to rhetoric: Legislation bottlenecks stalled a significant chunk of the agenda. Healthcare and Justice have seen just six completions each, and 5.9 million Canadians still don't have a family doctor. Bill C-15 passing clears some of the logjam, but a full year in, the government still is not implementing at the speed voters urgently called for.
The low hanging fruit has been picked. The big-ticket items have yet to break through: The 181 completed items were largely things that needed only a ministerial signature or a tax change. The commitments that would reshape daily life, from housing and healthcare to export credit, are still in progress or not started. Year two needs to look different.

Build Canada reviewed all 603 commitments the government made and assessed them against timelines and promises it set for itself. Our report is as objective as possible, however you may notice a builder's lens appear throughout. 

Last year, Prime Minister Mark Carney told Canadians that the country was in a time of national crisis. He promised to build at speeds not seen in generations. What’s happened since?

Build Canada’s outcomes tracker investigated all 603 commitments made by the Carney government. Its purpose: to make accessible to the public precisely what’s been promised, view the progress so far, and locate the sources behind every update from a single dashboard. The tool evaluates the government against the commitments and timelines it set for itself, not through the quality or wisdom of them or any partisan lens.

Across all commitments as of March 30, 2025: 288 are in progress, 129 have not started, 181 are completed, and 5 were abandoned. Much of the progress so far is either ground work or incremental.

The data we have collected points to a first year spent consulting, planning, and beginning to deploy funds, mainly through small initial tranches from multi-year spending envelopes.

Some items reflect completion of earlier or previous government promises, and Budget Bill C-15 was a massive piece of legislation that took much time and energy within the House of Commons. And several of the biggest-ticket items that affect Canadians’ daily lives — from housing and health infrastructure to export credit — are still waiting to transition from ideas to plans to delivery.

However their work is not without merit. A handful of files stand out: the Defence Investment Agency is up and running, with nearly $1.4 billion in domestic ammunition contracts supporting new factories and jobs. The interprovincial trade legislation removed barriers to goods, services, and workers having their licences and certificates recognized across provinces. And Canada this week reached NATO’s 2% spending target, marking the first time since the end of the Cold War and coming six years ahead of the previous government’s schedule.

Canada is no longer standing on the sidelines. But it now needs to pick up pace with the policy boldness, regulatory clarity, and permitting speed that a crisis calls for. The tracker’s findings show where momentum is overdue.

Finding 1: Modest progress across files

One of the most significant patterns in the data: 469 of 603 commitments (77.7%) currently register as "In Progress" or “Completed”. That’s encouraging. Much of the movement takes one of a few limited forms: preliminary consultations have been launched, initial fund deployments from multi-year spending envelopes have been made, or a line item now appears in a departmental plan. 

These are necessary steps, and some of the investments are long-term by design. This includes rebuilding the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), standing up new defence procurement systems, and deploying $115 billion in infrastructure over five years. These are multi-generational bets that were never going to show results in year one. That’s a good thing: a government is thinking in five- to 15-year windows, rather than just the next election cycle.

While Bill C-15 passed last week, the work needed to carry them through to completion is still substantial, and the tangible outcomes that would change Canadians’ everyday lives remain out of reach. Bold, decisive steps are needed to match the scale and urgency of the crisis Canada is in.

Examples from the data:

  • Launch a Trade Diversification Strategy to open new export markets: Trade missions were carried out and diplomatic engagement stepped up. Over the same period, Canada’s exports diversified slightly away from the U.S.: non‑U.S. goods exports grew 17.2% while the U.S. share of Canadian goods exports fell to 71.7% in 2025. Still, no formal strategy document has been published, and some of the activity cited predates the current government’s term.

Finding 2: Execution has not caught up to Rhetoric

Our methodology was strict: a commitment was not counted as started simply because it appeared in a budget document. The distinction matters because announcements and tabled bills do not change outcomes for Canadians until they become law.

It's worth acknowledging the effort to clarify intent. However, the data shows a persistent pattern: deliberation on critical policy categories dragged on, and several files were held up. Bills had either been tabled, were in committee, or were awaiting Royal Assent.

Leading up to Bill C-15 passing last week, a significant portion of the government's agenda was stalled by legislation. Of the 165 commitments that require a bill to pass, 130 were marked "In Progress." With the passage of Bill C-15, that number has since fallen to 47. Until those remaining bills pass, those files do not move and Canadians do not see or feel results.

That gap is especially visible in Healthcare and Justice. These areas were central to the public conversation heading into the last election. Canadians were promised action on family doctors, health infrastructure, justice corrections, and firearms. Yet in both Healthcare and Justice, there have been six completions to date, and an estimated 5.9 million adults do not have a family doctor, nurse practitioner or primary care team.

A full year in, the government still is not implementing at the speed voters urgently called for.

Examples from the data:

  • In Justice and Public Safety, 22 of 40 commitments are “In Progress”: Much of that status reflects legislative items sitting in the legislative pipeline. And while the Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program is fully operational, the $586 million allocated for gun violence reduction initiatives remained blocked until Bill C-15 passed just this week.

Finding 3: The low hanging fruit has been picked, and the big-ticket items have yet to break through

Our review of the 181 commitments marked as completed revealed another telling pattern: the government acted first on measures that required only a ministerial signature, a tax change, or action through existing programs.

That was the right place to start. But the commitments that would most directly reshape daily life in Canada are still largely unfinished — housing, healthcare, and the economy.

The files that require new institutions, new legislation, new programs, and sustained political will are still on the drawing board. That’s understandable in year one, but year two needs to look different. The groundwork has been laid on many of these files. Now the big-ticket items need to move.

Examples of what got completed:

Examples of what hasn’t been completed:


Conclusion

Taken together, the findings tell a clear story: real progress has been made, and it should be recognized. But much of what has happened so far has followed the path of least resistance: quick wins, low-risk spending, procedural check-boxes. Canadian democracy has a long record of moving on what is easiest and deferring what is hardest.

This government has the mandate, the agenda, and the stated ambition to break that pattern. And while the data shows it hasn’t yet, it also points to a breakthrough within reach. We imagine they will do so over the next year.

Indicative Legal Changes

Stay Connected
Subscribe
Build a Better Canada
Get Involved
Subscribe