An Act to amend the Energy Efficiency Act
Overall, the bill modernizes Canada's energy efficiency framework in ways that can reduce energy costs, raise competitiveness, and catalyze innovation and trade. Some provisions risk added compliance burden and weaker oversight over ministerial powers, but targeted adjustments can protect businesses while maintaining safety and accelerating growth.
What specific de minimis thresholds, SME carve‑outs, and phased timelines will the minister implement to prevent the new testing, reporting, and six‑year record‑keeping powers from overburdening small importers and retailers?
Why are exemption orders and cost‑recovery fees carved out from the Statutory Instruments Act and the Service Fees Act, and what concrete parliamentary oversight and fee caps will be in place to protect businesses and consumers?
Given the authority to compel access to proprietary software and digital modelling tools and to share information with foreign governments, what binding safeguards will protect intellectual property, personal data, and commercially sensitive information, and will names be published only after a final determination?
Efficiency lowers energy costs, improves product performance, and supports innovation and trade, all of which can raise living standards and competitiveness.
New testing, reporting, seizure, and record‑keeping powers add burdens, but sandboxes, harmonization, incorporation by reference, and flexible exemptions can streamline approvals and reduce duplication.
Higher efficiency and anti‑greenwashing improve market integrity and lower energy intensity; alignment with U.S./Mexico standards supports scale and competitiveness.
Harmonization and recognition of technical standards can ease cross‑border market access for efficient products, supporting export growth.
Regulatory sandboxes and exemptions explicitly aim to stimulate innovation and economic growth in energy‑using products and emerging energy sources.
Shifting to AMPs and compliance agreements, dynamic incorporation of standards, and periodic reporting can improve enforcement efficiency, though SIA/SFA carve‑outs reduce oversight and could be refined.
No tax measures are included.
The reforms are significant but administrative; impacts build over time rather than delivering an immediate, economy‑wide step‑change.
Did we get the builder vote wrong?
Email [email protected]