National Caribbean Heritage Month
An Act respecting Caribbean Heritage Month
Summary
- Designates the month of July each year as Caribbean Heritage Month across Canada.
- Recognizes the historic and ongoing contributions of Canadians of Caribbean origin to the country’s social, cultural, political, and economic life.
- Creates a commemorative observance only; it does not establish new programs, spending, taxes, or regulatory powers.
- Highlights the role and impact of Caribbean cultural festivals, including the Toronto Caribbean Carnival, in Canada’s cultural and economic landscape.
Builder Assessment
Principles Analysis
—
Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.
Symbolic recognition may modestly support tourism and community pride, but it contains no direct economic measures.
—
Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).
Does not change regulation or administration; neither reduces nor adds red tape.
—
Drive national productivity and global competitiveness, including removing interprovincial trade barriers and improving labour mobility (one country, one market).
No measures affecting productivity, skills, or competition; potential indirect cultural-branding benefits only.
—
Grow exports of Canadian products and resources, and move up the value chain by processing resources domestically rather than exporting them raw.
No trade or export provisions; any effect on exports via tourism or cultural branding is indirect.
—
Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.
No incentives or programs for investment or innovation; purely commemorative.
—
Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).
Does not alter service delivery; potential minimal awareness costs only.
—
Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.
No tax or fiscal reforms.
—
Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.
A symbolic observance without material economic impact; neither advances nor impedes large-scale prosperity.
Did we get the builder vote wrong?
Email [email protected]
PartySenate
StatusAt second reading in the Senate
Last updatedN/A
TopicsSocial Issues, Education
Parliament45