Build Canada LogoBuilder MP
← Back to bills

National Framework on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Act

An Act respecting a national framework for fetal alcohol spectrum disorder

Summary

The bill requires the Minister of Health to create and table a national framework to prevent, diagnose, and support Canadians affected by fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD). It mandates national standards, professional training, coordinated research and information-sharing, and a public awareness strategy on the risks of alcohol use during pregnancy, including potential legislative and policy recommendations related to alcohol consumption and marketing. The Minister must consult provinces and territories, Indigenous communities, experts, caregivers, and other stakeholders. The framework must be tabled within 18 months and published, with a follow-up implementation and effectiveness report due within five years.

  • Establishes a national FASD framework with standards for prevention, diagnosis, and supports
  • Requires training and guidance for health and related professionals
  • Promotes research coordination and intergovernmental information-sharing
  • Includes an awareness strategy and potential recommendations on alcohol policy and marketing
  • Mandates broad consultations, including Indigenous leadership and provincial/territorial partners
  • Sets timelines: 18 months to table the framework; 5-year implementation and effectiveness report

Builder Assessment

Vote Yes

The bill advances a coordinated, prevention-first approach that can improve health outcomes, reduce stigma, and lower long-term public costs, which supports productivity and service efficiency. Risks include jurisdictional friction and potential overreach on alcohol marketing; these can be mitigated with evidence-based, proportionate measures and transparent costing.

  • Strengths: prevention and early support improve safety for mothers and infants; standardized practices and coordination can reduce costly fragmentation; long-term productivity gains via better educational and employment outcomes
  • Risks to manage: avoid one-size-fits-all standards that clash with provincial/territorial systems; ensure any marketing policy recommendations are evidence-based and proportionate to reduce unintended economic harm
  • Implementation asks: publish a costed plan with clear targets (incidence, diagnosis timelines, outcomes); fund training and supports to avoid unfunded mandates; include Indigenous-led program design; build privacy-protective data to track results; prioritize rapid early intervention pathways in primary care

Question Period Cards

What is the expected cost to develop and implement the national FASD framework, and will the government table a fully costed plan with measurable targets like incidence reduction and diagnosis wait times when the framework is tabled?

How will national standards respect provincial and territorial jurisdiction and avoid unfunded mandates, and what dedicated funding will accompany training and supports so service providers are not forced to do more with less?

Before recommending changes to alcohol policy or marketing, will the minister commit to publish the evidence base and an economic impact analysis, including effects on small producers and exporters, and to consult Indigenous communities and industry in detail?

Principles Analysis

Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.

Primarily a public health coordination bill; any prosperity gains are indirect via reduced long-term social and health costs.

Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).

A national framework could streamline fragmented approaches, but potential recommendations on alcohol marketing may constrain some commercial activity.

Drive national productivity and global competitiveness.

Preventing FASD and improving early diagnosis/support can enhance lifetime educational and workforce outcomes, modestly boosting productivity.

Grow exports of Canadian products and resources.

No direct impact on trade; any future alcohol marketing restrictions could have minor sector effects but are speculative.

Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.

Encourages research coordination but does not directly catalyze private investment or innovation incentives.

Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).

Standardized practices, prevention, and coordinated supports can reduce duplication and long-term fiscal pressures on health, education, and justice systems.

Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.

No tax measures are proposed.

Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.

A targeted health framework with limited macroeconomic scale; benefits are important but not transformative for overall prosperity.

Did we get the builder vote wrong?

Email [email protected]

PartySenate
StatusAt second reading in the Senate
Last updatedSep 23, 2025
TopicsHealthcare, Social Issues
Parliament45