← Back to bills

National Immigration Month Act

An Act respecting National Immigration Month

Summary

  • The bill designates November as National Immigration Month across Canada.
  • It recognizes the contributions of immigrants to Canada's social, cultural, and economic development and aims to educate future generations about immigration's role in building Canada.
  • It aligns timing with existing recognitions such as National Francophone Immigration Week and notes the November 1, 2001 royal assent of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
  • The bill creates no new programs, funding, rights, or regulatory changes; it is purely symbolic.

Builder Assessment

Vote No

The bill is ceremonial and does not materially advance any of the Core Tenets; its economic impact is neutral at best. While positive in sentiment, it neither reforms policy nor improves productivity, investment, exports, or government efficiency.

  • Rationale: No changes to immigration policy, credential recognition, labor market integration, taxation, or service delivery; hence no tangible pro-growth effects.
  • Rationale: Focus is symbolic rather than on large-scale prosperity or competitiveness.
  • To better align: Pair the observance with actions—streamlined skilled-worker processing and credential recognition, employer-matching initiatives, diaspora export programs, and a national talent-attraction campaign tied to measurable outcomes.
  • To better align: Use the month to launch regulatory simplifications (digital-by-default immigration services, service standards) and entrepreneurship pathways for immigrant founders.

Principles Analysis

—

Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.

Symbolic recognition does not materially affect GDP, incomes, or growth; any impact is indirect at best.

—

Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).

No regulatory or procedural changes are made; the bill neither reduces red tape nor expands economic freedoms.

—

Drive national productivity and global competitiveness, including removing interprovincial trade barriers and improving labour mobility (one country, one market).

No measures on skills, capital, competition, or technology adoption; productivity effects are absent.

—

Grow exports of Canadian products and resources, and move up the value chain by processing resources domestically rather than exporting them raw.

No trade, market access, or export-promotion policy is included.

—

Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.

While it signals openness to immigration, it creates no mechanisms to attract investors or innovators.

—

Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).

Creates no service-delivery changes; any communications activities would be minimal and optional.

—

Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.

Contains no tax provisions.

✗

Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.

It is a purely ceremonial designation with no substantive economic reforms or scale-oriented outcomes.

Did we get the builder vote wrong?

Email [email protected]

S-215

PartySenate
StatusAt second reading in the House of Commons
Last updatedMay 28, 2025
TopicsImmigration, Education, Social Issues
Parliament45