Build Canada LogoBuilder MP
← Back to bills

Protect Cash Access and Ban Digital Dollar

An Act to establish a framework for the continued access to and use of cash in Canada and to make related amendments to other Acts

Summary

This bill creates a federal framework to ensure Canadians can continue to access and use physical cash nationwide. It directs the Minister of Finance to review existing laws and policies affecting cash availability, develop measures to keep cash infrastructure viable and geographically accessible, and report to Parliament, followed by a three-year implementation review. It repeals the Governor in Council’s authority to call in (demonetize) coins and notes under the Currency Act. It amends the Bank of Canada Act to prohibit the Bank from issuing a digital form of the Canadian dollar (a central bank digital currency, or CBDC).

  • Mandates a national cash-access framework, including setting a "reasonable distance" for cash withdrawals and deposits.
  • Requires measures to protect the continued ability to use cash despite digital currencies and to reduce barriers to cash donations while maintaining anti–money laundering safeguards.
  • Requires public reporting and a follow-up effectiveness review.
  • Removes executive power to call in coins/notes; preserves references for any previously called-in notes.
  • Prohibits the Bank of Canada from issuing a CBDC.

Builder Assessment

Vote No

The bill’s goals on inclusion and resilience through cash access are worthwhile, but the blanket prohibition on a Canadian digital dollar and prescriptive cash-access mandates risk higher costs, reduced innovation, and weaker competitiveness. On balance, the conflicts with productivity, innovation, and government efficiency outweigh the benefits.

  • Positive: safeguards inclusion, privacy, and resilience during outages; supports charitable cash donations while referencing AML controls.
  • Major concern: a permanent CBDC ban removes a key policy and technology option that could improve payment efficiency, reduce costs, and attract fintech investment.
  • Efficiency risk: nationwide access mandates and reporting add bureaucracy and operational expense that are likely to be passed to consumers and taxpayers.
  • Flexibility and security: eliminating call-in powers may slow responses to counterfeiting or security incidents, reducing the ability to protect Canadians quickly.
  • Improvements Builders would support: allow exploration/piloting of a CBDC with clear privacy-by-design, offline resilience, and explicit parliamentary authorization before issuance; make the cash framework outcome-based and tech-neutral (focus on service levels, not fixed distances); target rural/remote access with incentives rather than blanket mandates; preserve a tightly scoped, transparent, and time-limited call-in authority for emergencies; ensure robust AML and anti-fraud measures to prioritize public safety.

Question Period Cards

What is the projected fiscal cost of meeting the bill’s nationwide cash-access and distance criteria, and who will pay—taxpayers, financial institutions, or small businesses?

Why is the bill pre-emptively banning a Canadian digital dollar when G7 peers are piloting CBDCs, and what is the plan to prevent a loss of fintech investment and cross-border payments competitiveness?

By removing the power to call in compromised or counterfeit-prone notes and coins, how will the government ensure the safety and integrity of the currency in emergencies without slower, costlier workarounds?

Principles Analysis

Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.

Cash access may enhance inclusion and resilience, but a permanent CBDC ban could limit future financial innovation that supports long-run prosperity.

Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).

Creates a new regulatory framework with possible prescriptive access standards and constraints on merchant payment choice; prohibiting CBDC reduces policy flexibility and market experimentation.

Drive national productivity and global competitiveness.

A CBDC prohibition forecloses potential gains in payment efficiency, settlement speed, and fintech competitiveness relative to peers exploring or piloting CBDCs.

Grow exports of Canadian products and resources.

The bill is not trade-focused; any impact on export competitiveness via cross-border payments modernization is indirect and uncertain.

Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.

Outright prohibition on a digital dollar chills fintech R&D and signals policy aversion to payment innovation, likely deterring investment.

Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).

Maintaining extensive cash infrastructure and adding reporting/oversight obligations increase costs; removing call-in powers may hinder efficient currency management in crises or counterfeiting events.

Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.

No material changes to taxation or incentives.

Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.

The bill is largely administrative and precludes a potentially transformative digital infrastructure (CBDC) that could enable large-scale productivity gains.

Did we get the builder vote wrong?

Email [email protected]

PartyMember of Parliament
StatusOutside the Order of Precedence
Last updatedN/A
TopicsEconomics, Technology and Innovation, Trade and Commerce, Social Issues, Infrastructure
Parliament45