Build Canada LogoBuilder MP
← Back to bills

Flight Attendants’ Remuneration Act

An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (flight attendants)

Summary

  • Amends the Canada Labour Code to require airlines to count pre-flight and post-flight duties, mandatory training, and time at the workplace at the employer's disposal (including delays) as paid working hours for flight attendants.
  • Requires employers to pay at least the regular wage rate for these duties and periods, not a reduced rate or unpaid status.
  • Clarifies that delay time is paid whether or not the delay is within the employer’s control.
  • Aims to address uncompensated work time for flight attendants, which may increase labour costs and potentially affect airline operations and fares.

Builder Assessment

Vote No

Compensating safety-critical and employer-directed time is important for fairness and safety, but this bill mandates regular-rate pay for broad on-duty periods and uncontrollable delays, increasing costs and reducing flexibility for a globally competitive industry. Without offsetting productivity measures or flexibility, it likely undermines competitiveness and adds regulatory constraints that conflict with growth-oriented goals.

  • Positive: Ensures fair pay for mandatory duties and training, which can support safety and workforce stability.
  • Concerns: Prescriptive rules for time calculation and delay pay raise costs, reduce contractual freedom, and risk higher fares and service cuts, particularly on thin regional routes.
  • Suggested improvements: Allow collective bargaining alternatives that maintain safety and minimum standards while offering flexibility in compensating delay time (e.g., per-diem or capped amounts); limit mandatory regular-rate pay for delays outside the employer’s control; phase in the change to manage costs while encouraging airlines to pursue scheduling and operational productivity gains.

Question Period Cards

What is the estimated increase in labour costs, ticket prices, and potential route reductions if airlines must pay flight attendants their regular rate for all pre- and post-flight duties, training, and delay time?

How will this bill interact with existing collective agreements, and will the minister allow flexibility through bargaining to handle uncontrollable delays without compromising safety or fair compensation?

What analysis has been done on the competitiveness of Canadian carriers versus U.S. and international airlines under these mandates, and will the government consider a phased implementation or caps on delay pay to prevent job losses and service cuts?

Principles Analysis

Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.

Improved pay fairness may aid retention and service quality, but higher operating costs for airlines could offset broader prosperity gains; net effect is uncertain.

Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).

Imposes prescriptive pay and time-accounting rules on a specific sector, increasing compliance burden and limiting contractual flexibility.

Drive national productivity and global competitiveness.

Mandated regular-rate pay for delays and non-flight duties may raise unit costs and weaken Canadian carriers against international competitors without clear productivity offsets.

Grow exports of Canadian products and resources.

No direct effect on export capacity; aviation costs may indirectly influence trade connectivity, but the linkage is indirect and uncertain.

Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.

Higher, less predictable labour costs could deter investment in Canadian aviation networks and fleet expansion; incentives for innovation are not included.

Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).

Minimal administrative changes for government; enforcement may modestly increase oversight workload but not materially change service efficiency.

Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.

No tax measures are included.

Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.

A narrow sectoral change with limited macroeconomic impact; benefits and costs are primarily confined to airlines and flight attendants.

Did we get the builder vote wrong?

Email [email protected]

PartyNDP
StatusOutside the Order of Precedence
Last updatedOct 21, 2025
TopicsLabor and Employment
Parliament45