Build Canada LogoBuilder MP
← Back to bills

End Minister's Control Over Labour Board

An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code

Summary

  • Repeals section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, removing the Minister of Labour’s authority to intervene in industrial disputes by referring questions to the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) or directing the Board to act.
  • Shifts dispute resolution fully to existing CIRB processes and the parties, limiting rapid executive involvement during labour conflicts in federally regulated sectors.
  • Aims to reduce executive interference and politicization of labour disputes, but could lengthen or complicate resolution of urgent disputes affecting supply chains and public safety.
  • Makes no changes to taxation, spending, or other parts of the Code beyond eliminating the ministerial power.

Builder Assessment

Vote No

Overall, the bill removes an important tool for rapid resolution of industrial disputes, increasing the risk of supply-chain shocks that undermine prosperity, productivity, and exports. While curbing ministerial discretion can reduce politicization, the absence of replacement safeguards threatens economic resilience and the safety and security of Canadians that Builders prioritize.

  • Risks longer strikes and wider economic harm in federally regulated sectors central to trade and logistics.
  • Provides no streamlined alternative (e.g., statutory expedited timelines or emergency criteria) to manage urgent disputes.
  • Slight gain in limiting executive overreach does not outweigh potential costs to investment confidence and national competitiveness.
  • Suggested improvements: preserve a narrowly defined, time-limited emergency referral power for imminent safety or critical economic harm; set expedited CIRB timelines and resource capacity for urgent cases within existing budgets; require post-incident transparency reporting to drive continuous improvement; strengthen early voluntary mediation to resolve disputes faster without adding red tape.

Question Period Cards

How will the government prevent prolonged disruptions in ports, rail, and aviation when it can no longer refer urgent questions to the CIRB or direct time-sensitive action under section 107?

What GDP, export, and inflation modelling has the department completed on the repeal of section 107, and will the minister table that analysis before the House votes?

Will the minister amend the bill to retain a narrowly scoped, time-limited emergency power to protect public safety and critical infrastructure, with clear triggers, expedited timelines, and transparent reporting?

Principles Analysis

Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.

Removing a tool for rapid settlement of major industrial disputes risks longer work stoppages and broader economic losses.

Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).

Curtails discretionary ministerial interference, reducing executive overreach; however, benefits depend on CIRB’s ability to act swiftly without added delay.

Drive national productivity and global competitiveness.

Limits rapid government response to critical sector disputes, increasing risk of supply-chain disruptions that depress productivity and competitiveness.

Grow exports of Canadian products and resources.

Prolonged port, rail, and air disputes could impede exports, harming Canada’s trade performance.

Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.

Greater uncertainty around dispute resolution can deter investment and delay projects in federally regulated, trade-dependent sectors.

Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).

Reduces ministerial workload but may raise downstream costs from longer disruptions; net efficiency impact is unclear.

Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.

No tax provisions are affected.

Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.

A narrow administrative repeal with potential economy-wide downsides; it does not advance a large-scale growth agenda.

Did we get the builder vote wrong?

Email [email protected]

PartyNDP
StatusOutside the Order of Precedence
Last updatedOct 6, 2025
TopicsLabor and Employment
Parliament45