Build Canada LogoBuilder MP
← Back to bills

Interim Funding to Keep Government Running

An Act for granting to His Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2027

Summary

This bill authorizes the government to spend up to $86,422,679,148 from the Consolidated Revenue Fund in 2026–27 for items in the Main Estimates not otherwise provided, largely as interim supply across departments and agencies. Funds are limited to the specific purposes set out in each vote and schedule, using fractional allocations (e.g., 3/12 to 11/12) of the annual Main Estimates. It permits accounting adjustments after year‑end and provides extended lapse and payment-order rules for certain items (notably Schedule 2) through March 31, 2028. It also includes Treasury Board contingency authorities, defence and security supplementary authorities, and token authorities related to international financial institutions and Ukraine loan guarantees.

  • Total interim appropriation: $86.423B, spanning Schedules 1.1 to 1.9 and Schedule 2
  • Large interim allocations include: Indigenous Services grants and contributions ($15.513B), Crown-Indigenous Relations grants and contributions ($5.159B), Employment and Social Development grants and contributions ($6.257B), Health grants and contributions ($2.966B), Global Affairs trade/development/humanitarian ($1.398B), RCMP operations and benefits ($1.676B combined), Shared Services Canada O&M and capital (~$920M), NSERC ($509M) and SSHRC ($451M), TBS Public Service Insurance ($1.680B)
  • Treasury Board votes: Government Contingencies ($916.7M) and Defence and Security Initiatives ($916.7M) with reuse authority; CRA (Schedule 2) receives $1.212B with two-fiscal-year availability
  • Accounting and cash management: post–year-end adjustment authority; extended lapse and payment ordering for Schedule 2 to March 31, 2028
  • Token ($1) authorities for international financial assistance/guarantees (IDA, EBRD-Naftogaz, IBRD-Ukraine) noted in Schedule 1.9

Builder Assessment

Vote Yes

Overall, the bill merits support as a necessary interim supply measure that sustains core services, safety and security, trade promotion, and innovation capacity while full supply is considered. However, it lacks explicit performance, efficiency, and export-growth commitments that Builders expect for long-run prosperity and competitiveness.

  • Positive: Maintains essential operations across safety, security, trade, infrastructure, and research while avoiding program shutdowns.
  • Positive: Keeps innovation and investment-attraction institutions funded, supporting near-term economic resilience.
  • Concern: No embedded performance metrics, unit-cost targets, or efficiency requirements attached to large grants and contributions.
  • Concern: Broad contingency and defence/security votes with reuse authority risk weak oversight without transparent drawdown reporting.
  • Improvements: Tie draws from contingency and defence/security votes to published deliverables, deadlines, and quarterly reporting.
  • Improvements: Publish program-level results, unit costs, and lapse/use-of-funds reports for the top 20 appropriations by value.
  • Improvements: Commit to measurable service standards and productivity gains (e.g., digital service uptime, processing times) in Shared Services, CRA, and PSPC.
  • Improvements: Link trade and investment appropriations to export and FDI targets, with sectoral milestones and supplier-diversification outcomes.
  • Improvements: Use outcome-based, performance-tied agreements and sunsetting for time-limited spending to reduce bureaucratic inertia without compromising safety and security.

Question Period Cards

What concrete outcomes, unit-cost targets, and quarterly performance reports will the government table for the largest grants and contributions funded by this interim supply—particularly in Indigenous Services, Health, and Employment and Social Development—so Parliament can verify value for money?

Why does this bill provide $1 billion for Government Contingencies and $1 billion for Defence and Security Initiatives with reuse authority, and what safeguards will prevent these votes from bypassing full parliamentary scrutiny or expanding programs without clear results and timelines?

Given Schedule 2 allows CRA appropriations to be spent and adjusted through March 31, 2028, will the government publish a detailed list of all reprofiled amounts and commit to measurable productivity gains and service standards to deliver better service at lower cost to Canadians and businesses?

Principles Analysis

Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.

This is a routine interim appropriation to keep government operations running; any impact on overall prosperity depends on downstream program execution rather than this authority itself.

Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).

The bill neither adds nor removes regulatory burdens; it provides spending authority without structural changes to permitting or administrative processes.

Drive national productivity and global competitiveness.

Funding for Shared Services, Statistics Canada, and trade promotion may indirectly support productivity, but the bill does not implement productivity reforms or targets.

Grow exports of Canadian products and resources.

Allocations to Global Affairs for trade and investment promotion exist, yet the bill offers no export-expansion targets or policy changes to measurably grow trade.

Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.

Interim funding for NSERC, SSHRC, Invest in Canada, and Industry-related operations sustains core innovation and investment attraction capacity pending full supply.

Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).

It keeps essential services funded (including safety and security) but sets no explicit cost-efficiency requirements, benchmarks, or service-level commitments.

Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.

No tax policy or incentive changes are included; this is an appropriations measure only.

Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.

This is standard interim supply without transformative reforms or measurable economy-wide growth strategies.

Did we get the builder vote wrong?

Email [email protected]

PartyPresident of the Treasury Board
StatusRoyal assent received
Last updatedN/A
TopicsEconomics, Indigenous Affairs, Foreign Affairs, National Security, Healthcare, Social Welfare, Infrastructure, Labor and Employment, Housing and Urban Development
Parliament45