An Act to establish a national framework respecting attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Overall, the bill is procedural and incremental, with unclear economic impact and added process that risks bureaucratic inertia. While it could support efficiency and human-capital outcomes over time, it lacks concrete measures that drive growth, competitiveness, or investment.
No question period cards yet.
Potential human-capital gains from better ADHD outcomes are indirect and speculative; the bill contains no direct growth levers.
Creates a new federal framework with multi‑year reporting requirements, adding process rather than removing barriers or streamlining regulation.
Could modestly improve productivity via better education and work outcomes for people with ADHD, but lacks implementation specifics or investments.
No provisions related to trade, export capacity, or global market access.
Does not create incentives, funding, or regulatory changes that would catalyze private investment or innovation.
A national, evidence-oriented framework could reduce fragmentation, encourage early intervention, and lower long‑run costs if well executed.
Contains no tax policy elements.
Narrow, process-heavy health planning with long timelines; effects on prosperity are likely incremental rather than transformative.
Did we get the builder vote wrong?
Email [email protected]