Keeping Children Safe Act
An Act to amend the Divorce Act
Summary
- Requires legal advisers in divorce cases to assess the risk of family violence and, if risk is present, develop an appropriate safety plan.
- Directs courts to better recognize coercive control and its impacts when making parenting and contact decisions, prioritizing child safety and trauma-informed evidence.
- Revises best-interests-of-the-child factors and clarifies relocation burdens, aiming to curb misuse of 'parental alienation' claims that could endanger children.
- Enables existing orders that relied on parental-alienation-type findings to be revisited under the new standards once the Act is in force.
Builder Assessment
Principles Analysis
—
Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.
The bill focuses on family-court safety and child protection; any economic effects are indirect and not its purpose.
—
Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).
It adds duties for legal advisers but may streamline decisions by clarifying standards around coercive control and relocation; net impact on economic freedom is unclear.
—
Drive national productivity and global competitiveness, including removing interprovincial trade barriers and improving labour mobility (one country, one market).
Reducing domestic violence can improve long-run human capital, but the bill is not a targeted productivity or competitiveness measure.
—
Grow exports of Canadian products and resources, and move up the value chain by processing resources domestically rather than exporting them raw.
No direct connection to trade or export growth.
—
Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.
Unrelated to investment or innovation policy.
✗
Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).
Mandatory risk assessments and expanded evidentiary considerations may increase case complexity and legal costs, at least in the short term.
—
Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.
No tax changes.
—
Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.
This is a narrow family-law reform with limited macroeconomic implications.
Did we get the builder vote wrong?
Email [email protected]
PartyMember of Parliament
StatusAt consideration in committee in the House of Commons
Last updatedSep 18, 2025
TopicsSocial Issues
Parliament45