Build Canada LogoBuilder MP
← Back to bills

Canada Limits Immigration Factors in Court Sentences for Non‑Citizens

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (immigration status in sentencing)

Summary

This bill amends the Criminal Code to require judges, when sentencing a non‑citizen, to ignore any potential immigration consequences to the offender or their family. It removes judicial discretion to adjust sentences in light of possible deportation, loss of status, or related impacts. The change is status‑blind and applies across all offences, without exceptions. It does not create new crimes or penalties; it only limits what factors a court may consider at sentencing.

  • Adds new section 718.202 to the Criminal Code.
  • Prohibits considering immigration status impacts on non‑citizen offenders and their family in sentencing.
  • Eliminates the practice of tailoring sentences to avoid deportation or inadmissibility thresholds.
  • Applies broadly across offences and jurisdictions, with no stated exceptions.
  • Likely fiscal and operational impacts on corrections and removal processes; public‑safety gains are uncertain and unquantified.

Builder Assessment

Abstain

Principles Analysis

Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.

Sentencing rules have, at most, indirect economic effects; any impact on prosperity is unclear and likely minimal.

Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).

The bill constrains judicial discretion but does not materially change economic freedom or reduce bureaucracy for workers and businesses.

Drive national productivity and global competitiveness.

No direct link to productivity or competitiveness; any reputational effects on talent attraction are speculative.

Grow exports of Canadian products and resources.

No direct implications for trade, market access, or export capacity.

Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.

Potential signaling effects for global talent aside, the measure does not target investment or innovation levers.

Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).

By removing a mitigating factor, the bill could increase incarceration time and drive more removals, raising costs for corrections, CBSA, and tribunals without clear efficiency gains.

Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.

No tax policy changes.

Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.

This is a narrow criminal‑procedure change with limited macroeconomic relevance, not a driver of broad prosperity.

Did we get the builder vote wrong?

Email [email protected]

PartyConservative
StatusOutside the Order of Precedence
Last updatedSep 17, 2025
TopicsCriminal Justice
Parliament45